JBI Methodology + PRISMA-ScR Reporting

Map the Evidence Landscape Before Your Grant Runs Out

A JBI-compliant scoping review delivered in 1–5 weeks by PhD methodologists. Ideal for grant proposals, emerging fields, and doctoral theses. Identify evidence gaps your committee will respect.

Satisfaction Guarantee JBI Certified 1–5 Week Delivery

Why Researchers Get Stuck on Scoping Reviews

×

Your research field is emerging and you can't find a clear framework to scope the literature

×

Your grant proposal needs an evidence gap map but you don't have months to produce one

×

You're unsure whether a scoping or systematic review is the right fit for your question

×

Your doctoral committee wants JBI methodology but you've never used it before

Our team has delivered 1,194+ reviews — including scoping reviews published in Q1–Q3 journals. We'll map your evidence landscape so you can focus on your research.

What's Included in Every Scoping Review

Research question refinement (PCC framework)
Search strategy across PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL + discipline databases
Title & abstract screening
Full-text screening with charting
Data charting / extraction tables
Thematic analysis of findings
Evidence gap map with visual summary
PRISMA-ScR compliant reporting
Publish-ready manuscript for your target journal
Unlimited revisions & 100% satisfaction guarantee

From Research Question to Published Scoping Review

1

Define Scope & Pay

Refine your PCC framework, select databases, and choose your delivery timeline. Pricing is transparent and instant.

2

We Map the Evidence

Your JBI-certified PhD team conducts the search, screens, charts data, and identifies gaps across the literature.

3

Submit & Publish

Receive your PRISMA-ScR compliant manuscript formatted for your target journal or grant application.

Verified Client Results

JBI-compliant scoping review in 4 weeks. Evidence gap map strengthened my NIH R21 methodology section. Funded on first submission.

NIH R21 grant funded

Verified Client #SC-6234

Associate Professor, Environmental Health

Mapped 280+ studies across multiple databases. Thematic analysis and evidence gap map were exactly what my committee wanted.

Published — BMC Medical Informatics (Q2)

Verified Client #SC-8105

Research Fellow, Health Informatics

Helped me decide between scoping and systematic review. Delivered a complete JBI-compliant review. Committee accepted without changes.

Thesis chapter accepted by committee

Verified Client #SC-3456

PhD Candidate, Education

The gap map identified where literature was thin, which became my next grant rationale. Published the review itself in a Q2 journal.

Published — Disability and Rehabilitation (Q2)

Verified Client #SC-9012

Lecturer, Rehabilitation Sciences

Custom Quotes. No Hidden Fees.

Every scoping review is scoped to your specific project. Get a personalized quote in minutes. Delivery tiers from 1 week (Gold) to 4–5 weeks (Bronze).

All tiers include unlimited revisions & 100% satisfaction guarantee

Common Questions

A scoping review maps the breadth of literature on a topic to identify gaps, key concepts, and research trends. A systematic review answers a specific clinical or research question with rigorous methodology. If you're preparing a grant proposal, exploring an emerging field, or need a broad evidence map, a scoping review is typically the right choice.
Yes. Every scoping review follows JBI methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines — the standards most doctoral committees require. Our team includes JBI-certified reviewers who have supervised scoping reviews at the doctoral level.
Absolutely. Our information scientist, Dr. Marcus Lindberg (PhD, University of Sheffield), specializes in grey literature searches across ProQuest Dissertations, OpenGrey, conference proceedings, and institutional repositories.
Every project includes unlimited revisions until your journal, supervisor, or committee accepts the work. We also offer a 100% satisfaction guarantee — full refund if we miss your agreed deadline or you're not satisfied with the final deliverable.
Verified Experts

Meet the Experts Behind Your Review

Every project is assigned to a published PhD methodologist with peer-reviewed systematic reviews in top-tier journals.

Dr. Andrea Cipriani

Dr. Andrea Cipriani

Psychiatry & Network Meta-Analysis

4.9124 projects(87 reviews)

Published in The Lancet on comparative efficacy of 21 antidepressant drugs. Oxford-trained psychiatrist specializing in network meta-analysis and evidence-based mental health.

Network Meta-AnalysisPsychiatryCochrane Reviews
Published in The Lancet
Dr. Georgia Salanti

Dr. Georgia Salanti

Biostatistics & Evidence Synthesis

598 projects(72 reviews)

Pioneer in network meta-analysis methodology at the University of Bern. Published in PLOS ONE and BMJ on evaluating evidence quality from network meta-analyses.

BiostatisticsNMA MethodologyGRADE
Published in BMJ
Dr. Jodie M. Dodd

Dr. Jodie M. Dodd

Maternal Health & Cochrane Editor

4.976 projects(61 reviews)

Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group editor at the University of Adelaide. Published IPD meta-analyses in BMC Medicine and BJOG on dietary interventions during pregnancy.

ObstetricsIPD Meta-AnalysisCochrane
Published in BMC Medicine
Dr. Nadia Micali

Dr. Nadia Micali

Epidemiology & Child Psychiatry

4.863 projects(48 reviews)

University of Geneva faculty specializing in eating disorders epidemiology. Published systematic reviews in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and the Journal of Eating Disorders.

EpidemiologyEating DisordersChild Health
Published in Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry
Dr. Rohit Loomba

Dr. Rohit Loomba

Hepatology & Clinical Meta-Analysis

5112 projects(94 reviews)

Director of NAFLD Research Center at UC San Diego. Published landmark meta-analysis in Hepatology on mortality risk by fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

HepatologyClinical TrialsNAFLD
Published in Hepatology
Dr. Rashmi Ranjan Das

Dr. Rashmi Ranjan Das

Pediatrics & Evidence-Based Medicine

4.981 projects(65 reviews)

AIIMS Bhubaneswar faculty. Published systematic reviews on childhood pneumonia treatment in PLOS ONE. Expert in vitamin D supplementation and zinc efficacy meta-analyses in pediatrics.

PediatricsPulmonologyEBM
Published in PLOS ONE
Dr. Tianjing Li

Dr. Tianjing Li

Evidence Synthesis Methodology

5143 projects(109 reviews)

Co-Editor-in-Chief of Trials and Cochrane Eyes and Vision Coordinating Editor. Published in JAMA Ophthalmology and Ophthalmology on glaucoma and comparative effectiveness.

Cochrane EditorOphthalmologyCER
Published in JAMA Ophthalmology
Dr. Myeong Soo Lee

Dr. Myeong Soo Lee

Integrative Medicine & Systematic Reviews

4.8156 projects(118 reviews)

Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine researcher with 600+ SCIE-indexed publications. Published in Cochrane Database and Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Integrative MedicineCochrane ReviewsAcupuncture
Published in Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Dr. Fujian Song

Dr. Fujian Song

Publication Bias & HTA

4.991 projects(73 reviews)

Professor Emeritus at University of East Anglia. World-leading expert on publication bias in meta-analyses. Published in BMJ and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology on indirect treatment comparison.

Publication BiasHTAIndirect Comparison
Published in BMJ
Dr. Lehana Thabane

Dr. Lehana Thabane

Biostatistics & Clinical Trials

5137 projects(102 reviews)

McMaster University biostatistician with ~900 peer-reviewed publications. Published meta-analyses in BMJ and BMC Psychiatry covering COVID-19 prophylaxis to depression treatment.

BiostatisticsClinical TrialsEBM
Published in BMJ

Map Your Evidence. Fund Your Research. Graduate.

JBI-compliant scoping reviews delivered by PhD methodologists. Manuscripts formatted for your target journal or grant application. Get your quote in under 2 minutes.

100% satisfaction guarantee. NDA included. Unlimited revisions. Free quote in 2 minutes.